The Bishop's Pro-Life Document: "About Time!"
by Patrick S Buchanan (USA), reprinted from The Wanderer Vol 131 No. 10.12-98
No matter how devoutly Republican leaders may wish it were so, the issue of life is not going away. A few weeks ago, ever so gingerly, the US Catholic hierarchy steered itself toward a direct, public confrontation with "pro-choice" Catholic political leaders.
By a 217:30 vote, the bishops’ conference issued Living the Gospel of Life: A Challenge to American Catholics. "As chief teachers in the church, " they declared " we must explain, persuade, correct, and admonish those in leadership positions who contradict the Gospel of Life through their actions and policies."
"[N]o appeal to ... majority will or pluralism ever excuses a public official from defending life to the greatest extent possible," said the bishops. Neither court decisions nor Democrat votes can alter truth. Moreover, being right on other issues does not justify a "wrong choice" on abortion.
The old seamless garment argument, whereby "prochoice" Catholics insisted that abortion was just one of a host of social justice issues, has just been shredded. Now, life - no abortions, no euthanasia, no assisted suicide - is the paramount Catholic issue.
The bishops’ original draft, however, was tougher. It read: "Catholic public officials who disregard church teaching on the dignity of the human person indirectly collude in the taking of human life. In doing so, they jeopardise their own salvation, erode the community of faith, and give scandal to the faithful." That last sentence was dropped at the insistence, says a source, of two cardinals who did not want to confront their famous Catholic politicians.
With 35 million unborn babies destroyed since Roe v. Wade, and two states in 1998 rejecting even a ban on the act of infanticide called partial birth abortion, many might say of the bishops’ call, "About time!" Moral authority, after all, like muscle tissue, atrophies when not exercised, and, surely, that has been happening to the Church.
But better late than never, though some bishops fretted, and others felt compelled to reassure the press that no "pro-choice" Catholic would be denied the sacraments. "We run the risk of creating another anti-Catholic backlash," warns Bishop Howard J Hubbard of the Diocese of Albany New York.
But so what? Like Supreme Court justices, bishops have life tenure and job security; they are not term limited. What do they have to worry about? And how can the bishops continue to indulge pro-abortion Catholics now attacking pro-life opponents, who echo the Holy Father, as "extremists"?
If preaching Catholic truths to a hedonistic society that does not want to hear them reaps a few nasty editorials, doesn’t that go with the franchise? Surely, it is a tiny price compared to what Catholics are paying to uphold the faith in Indonesia, China and Sudan.
The day the conference closed, Bishop Donald W Trautman of Erie, Pennsylvania, applied the Gospel of Life by telling the popular Republican governor of Pennsylvania, Tom Ridge, who is "pro-choice", to no longer appear at Catholic events in his Erie Diocese.
Ridge agreed, saying that while he is "personally opposed" to abortion, he still supports a woman’s right to choose.
It will be interesting to see if the cardinals and bishops of Boston, New York, Baltimore and Chicago adopt the unpopular but courageous stand Bishop Trautman did when next they meet their "pro-choice" Catholic governors, senators and congressmen.
Sources say that high among the reasons the US bishops are moving toward confrontation is that, on their episcopal visits with Pope John Paul II, they have been sharply admonished to speak out by a Holy Father frustrated by the timidity of his American prelates.